Massachusetts Pro-Casino Referendum Takes the afternoon

Massachusetts Pro-Casino Referendum Takes the afternoon

Ah, sweet victory: Steve Wynn's Everett, Massachusetts casino can finally move ahead after a referendum vote supporting casinos passed last night.

Residents of Massachusetts have opted for to uphold the state's three-year-old casino law, voting overwhelmingly in yesterday's midterms in favor of maintaining the fledgling casino market, once the polls had predicted.

Somewhat confusingly, 'no' meant 'yes' for casinos on this ballot, as voters were asked whether the statutory legislation must be repealed, with 59.5 % to 40.5 percent deciding that no, it will never be repealed, meaning that yes, they wanted casinos.

Some commentators have actually suggested that the language used in posing the relevant question was deliberately muddled and created to confuse.

Nonetheless, it's a victory for MGM and Wynn Resorts, who may have had their respective jobs provided the greenlight by regulators and who can now finally and definitely go forward with the licensing process, a privilege which is why they will fork out $85 million a piece before a single cornerstone is laid.

Not surprisingly, casino executives had been jubilant and anxious to emphasize what the casinos will do for their communities that are future.

'Voters across the Commonwealth of Massachusetts today voiced their support of the 10,000 permanent job opportunities and significant financial benefits given by the Gaming Act of 2011,' said pleased MGM Chairman and CEO Jim Murren. 'MGM Resorts International want to thank the thousands of volunteers and supporters who comprehended precisely what was at stake and worked so difficult to bring this historic opportunity to realization for themselves and their neighbors … we are now able to begin the task of rebuilding a great downtown, and igniting a renaissance in Western Massachusetts.'

The Following Big Step

MGM now plans to construct an $800 million casino resort on a plot that is 14.5-acre downtown Springfield, with construction most likely to begin in the springtime and a scheduled opening in summer time of 2017.

Wynn Resorts, meanwhile, which fought a protracted bidding war with Mohegan Sun for the best to make an application for the only eastern Massachusetts license, the right it absolutely was granted just in early September, will get ahead along with its plans to construct a $1.6 billion casino for a contaminated former chemical plant in Everett, north of Boston. Wynn will pay millions to own the site cleaned up and decontaminated before construction ensues.

'While it happens to be an extended process, the benefits to every person in the Commonwealth will be well worth it,' said Wynn Resorts Senior Vice President Robert DeSalvio.

Never ever in Doubt?

The license that is third secured earlier within the year by Penn National Gaming, which quickly moved ahead featuring its intends to expand Plainridge Park harness racetrack into a slots parlor, despite knowing there was clearly a chance that the bill could possibly be repealed.

'It's a risk, however it's a calculated danger,' said Jay Snowden, Penn National's chief operating officer, several months straight back. 'We're confident we are going to prevail in november'

And he had been right, nevertheless the issue had been perhaps never really in doubt. While the Repeal the Deal contingent was vocal, it lacked the funding of its powerful opponents, and the vote that is pro-casino led regularly in the polls.

According to recent campaign finance reports, 'no' (meaning yes) vote campaigners had raised nearly $12 million, most of it donated by casino companies, while the 'yes' meaning no vote was able to raise just $675,000.

MGM donated $2.5 million and Wynn Resorts $1 million, while Penn National topped the bill with $3.2 million. This ended up being the explanation that the effort that is pro-casino able to spend $2 million on casino marketing in October alone, at a time whenever its opponents were a declaring a balance of $30,000 and debts of $400,000.

Nationwide Election Results May Affect US Online Gambling

Supporters of a Wynn casino in Everett celebrated the defeat of a casino repeal effort in Massachusetts. (Image: Barry Chin/Globe Staff)

Election Day 2014 did not feature a referendum on Internet gambling, nor did anything earth-shattering occur that will forever change the video gaming landscape in america.

Still, there were a true number of neighborhood results that were of interest to those who worry about gambling issues, and one overarching storyline that could contour the movement associated with the debate over online gambling for the next two years.

That big story, while you could have guessed, was the Republican takeover of the Senate.

The GOP has clinched at least 52 seats in the Senate, one more than was needed in order to take the majority while final results (including a runoff election and a decision by Independent Senator Angus King on which party to caucus with) won't be known for some time.

Republican Majority and On Line Poker

The Republican majorities in both houses are worth keeping an eye on while this shouldn't incite panic among those who enjoy online gambling. Thanks to a plank in the national platform that is republican the support of Las vegas, nevada Sands Chairman and CEO Sheldon Adelson, the most vocal voices in opposition to online gambling tend in the future through the GOP. The majority that is new lead supporters of the Restoration of America's Wire Act to try to advance the bill in Congress.

However, the odds of such a bill passing are still rather slim. Not everyone in the Republican Party is in favor of an online gambling ban, as well as many of those which can be may not think the issue is worth fighting over, as it really is hardly a major consideration on the list of public that is general. While those in support of a ban might be able to court enough Democratic help to offset the losses inside their own party, that's far from specific, and the prospect of a split within the GOP in the issue could be enough to avoid it from ever gaining any momentum.

Massachusetts Casino Repeal Defeated Handily

In more results that are local there have been two ballot initiatives of great interest to the gaming industry, one on each coast. On the East Coast, perhaps the gambling that is highest-profile of the 12 months took place in Massachusetts, where anti-casino activists were hoping to repeal a law that allowed for the certification and building of three resort casinos in the state, along with a slots parlor. As current polling suggested, the anti-casino forces came up well short, with 59 percent voting 'No' on the repeal.

Still, state officials acknowledged that the significant part of the populace that had been against their efforts had made their voices heard.

' We realize that approximately 41 percent voted in favor of the ballot initiative [meaning for the repeal], and it is our job to continue to earn the confidence of all the social people in Massachusetts proponents and opponents alike,' said Steve Crosby, chairman of the Massachusetts Gaming Commission.

Meanwhile, voters in California rejected Proposition 48, a measure that could have allowed the North Fork Rancheria Band of Mono Indians to create a major casino about 40 miles away from their reservation. Had the proposition passed, opponents said it would have set a precedent tribes that are allowing build video gaming facilities far beyond their lands.

'This vote no puts the ball squarely in the state Legislature's court: they now can make a policy that is consistent tribal gaming,' stated Cheryl Schmit, director of operate for California, friends opposing the proposition.

Some gubernatorial events may have an effect on the future of both land-based and online gambling in different states. Perhaps many notably, the re-election of Florida governor Rick Scott in a tight battle over Democratic challenger Charlie Crist was seen as a poor indication for on the web gambling in the state, as Scott has been a supporter of Adelson's efforts to ban Internet gambling.

Chukchansi Gold Casino Tribal Leaders Turn Themselves In After Break-In

Tex McDonald, leader of the group that stormed the Chukchansi casino final thirty days, turns himself in. (Image:

Two council that is tribal charged with serious offenses relating to last month's armed standoff during the Chukchansi Gold Resort and Casino near Coarsegold, California have turned themselves in. The casino had been stormed by 20 armed men on October 9, the culmination of a bizarre power struggle between competing factions vying for control of the casino.

No arrests were made at the scene, as the siege took place on tribal land, but Madera County District Attorney Michael Keitz announced last Friday that 15 of the aggressors would be charged with serious felonies, including kidnapping, false imprisonment, assault with a firearm, attack with a deadly weapon, and battery inflicting serious injury.

The group's leader, Tex McDonald, 64, and other council member Vernon James King, 59, turned on their own in on Monday, implemented several hours later on by two members of this security force that accompanied the group on the raid.

McDonald, whom has previous beliefs for assault with a weapon that is deadly making criminal threats, is charged with kidnapping, false imprisonment, attack by having a firearm, assault with a lethal weapon, battery causing serious injury, and assault with a stun gun, and his bail has been set at $1 million. The others face similar charges, with bail set at $800,000 for each.

Another safety guard was arrested Sunday, but during the time of writing, 10 people remain at large.

Disenrollment Controversy

The origin of the dispute among the Picayune Ranchera of Chukchansi Indians seems to relate towards the controversial practice of 'disenrollment,' in which a tribe strips certain members of their tribal status, hence doubting them the associated advantages, in this situation make money from the casino.

Since 2003, hundreds of members are stripped of their tribal affiliations, including some of the last native speakers of the Chukchansi language. This led to a disputed election in 2012 and a schism within the tribe between those that supported disenrollment and those bitterly opposed.

It seems the McDonald faction have been managing the casino from its base at a business that is nearby up to August, once the rival faction, led by Reggie Lewis, a proponent of disenrollment and incumbent frontrunner of the council after the disputed election, occupied the 10th and 11th floors associated with casino in the very early hours of the early morning, effortlessly taking it over.

Then in October, the Tribal Gaming Authority threatened to close the casino down and fine the tribe up to $16 million, because of late filing of audits. This prompted the McDonald faction to work, in what they claim was an attempt to retrieve the audits and save the casino.

Criminal or Hero?

And to some, despite the criminality of his tactics, McDonald is a hero, a 'patriot' fighting for the great associated with the tribe. 'My clients went in to recover papers and so the casino would not turn off,' claimed his attorney, adding that the faction represented the 'duly constituted tribal council. They just took steps to protect the tribe.'

Others, however, don't see quite the same heroic tactics in the break-in.

'Calling Tex McDonald a patriot is like calling a dictator democratically elected,' said Richard Verri, representing the Lewis group. ' The unlawful justice system will determine whether or otherwise not the images caught on video associated with the unlawful actions while the violence he committed upon a casino employee ended up being lawful or criminal.'

Long lasting truth associated with the matter, McDonald now faces a 'significant amount of time' in state prison, based on District Attorney Keitz. And meanwhile the casino remains shuttered by purchase of the judge that is federal with the consequence of lost revenue becoming devastating to the community.