Jose Canseco Loses a Finger, While Daniel Colman Wags One at Hellmuth

Jose Canseco Loses a Finger, While Daniel Colman Wags One at Hellmuth

Retired MLB star Jose Canseco lost a finger (again) during a poker tournament week that is last.

Jose Canseco was the figure that is central a weekend for the poker world that has been filled with fingers: some lost, some pointed at prominent names into the poker community. In Canseco's case, he seemingly have lost the same little finger for the 2nd time in about a month, something which few individuals (with any luck) will ever get to experience.

In late October, Canseco had been in the news headlines for accidentally shooting himself in the hand. According to Canseco, the incident happened while he was cleaning their gun in their kitchen. He finished up shooting their finger, which then must be surgically reattached. It seems some surgeons are more skilled than other people at digital fixes, however.

Finger Comes Off During Poker Tournament

Based on a tweet sent out by Canseco on however, the finger became detached again while he was playing in a poker tournament Thursday evening friday.

' I was playing in a poker competition final night and my little finger fell of,' Canseco tweeted. 'Someone took a video clip of it.'

Thankfully, Canseco didn't post that video, though there clearly was at least one supposed image of his finger before it fell off. As gruesome while the event may sound, however, Canseco said that this outcome might have been inescapable from the time he shot himself.

'My little finger should have been amputated right from the start,' Canseco tweeted. 'It was really loose with no bone in order to connect it. It had been additionally smelling actually bad.'

There was no word on whether or not Canseco won the hand in order to make up for losing the hand. Formerly, Canseco's fingers were best-known for gripping bats during his 17-year major league career being a professional baseball player, during which he hit 462 house runs.

Colman Gives Hellmuth the Verbal Finger

Meanwhile, One Drop winner Daniel Colman was pointing a finger, still firmly connected, of their own at 13-time World Series of Poker bracelet winner Phil Hellmuth. Colman made some comments that are harsh Hellmuth in a thread in regards to the latter's current look on a podcast hosted by Rounders journalist Brian Koppelman.

'Its embarrassing that we have to share our profession with whores like this person,' Colman wrote. 'he immediately comes on stage to shake my hand in front of a camera and congratulate me after I win one drop. As though he's the gatekeeper to the poker world and welcoming me in.

'It is truly pathetic that the 40 year old would behave the way he does at the table, as well as how spineless he is, simply willing to take any sponsorship no matter what the company's integrity,' the $22 million winner waxed on. ' Really makes me personally sad to think there's a chance some individuals may look as much as this charlatan. Folks of his attitude and character really are a cancer for this world.'

Hellmuth was apparently astonished and hurt by the feedback, and responded shortly to them on Twitter.

'Ouch, we was simply attacked big style on a terrific poker forum,' Hellmuth tweeted. 'It was personal plus it hurts, but I am proud of the man I will be!'

For their component, Colman later admitted that his choice of language was a touch too harsh, and made a decision to back off the tone of his post, even if he stood behind the message.

'I admit to being too harsh in my initial post. quick hits free slot games Phil didn't deserve that hateful of the message,' Colman later wrote. 'Having said that, we still stand by the main gist of my post. Phil's behavior in poker is atrocious, and I don't think it belongs in this game.'

NBA Commissioner Adam Silver Pushing for Legal US Sports Betting

NBA Commissioner Adam Silver claims that US legal sports gambling is regulated in the us. (Image: USATSI)

Can legal US recreations betting, across the board, be a thing ever? a surprising proponent has emerged in the proper execution of NBA Commissioner Adam Silver.

Commissioner Silver penned an op-ed for The ny Times recently, stating that he believes it is time to allow sports betting to happen lawfully through the United States. That stance is in opposition compared to that of all major activities organizations in the USA, including the previously held position by the NBA and its former commissioner, David Stern.

'Betting on professional sports happens to be illegal in the majority of the United States outside of Nevada,' Silver said in the beginning of their viewpoint piece. 'I think we need a different sort of approach.'

Currently Illegal generally in most States

Silver went on to describe the present state of sports wagering in the united states.

In 1992, Congress passed the Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act (PASPA), a piece of legislation that prohibited states from regulating sports betting, while grandfathering in four states that already had some form of the betting available. Nevada is the state that is only full activities betting, while Delaware, Montana and Oregon also provide the right to offer more limited kinds of sports-based gambling.

As Silver states, the NBA, along with other recreations leagues and businesses in the usa, has previously stood in opposition to legalizing activities gambling for decades. But which hasn't stopped people from gambling on the games, whatever the lack of a legal, regulated option.

'But despite appropriate restrictions, sports gambling is extensive,' Silver wrote. 'It is a thriving business that is underground operates free of regulation or oversight. Because there are few appropriate possibilities, those who wish to bet resort to bookmaking that is illicit and shady offshore websites.'

In accordance with Silver, some estimates place the volume of illegal sports gambling into the United States at the maximum amount of as $400 billion per year. That dwarfs the quantity of legal recreations betting that happens in Las vegas, nevada gambling enterprises and other locations in Nevada.

Trends Aim Towards Regulation

Within the piece, Silver writes about the 'domestic and worldwide trends' towards regulation of activities betting. He points out that a lot of states now offer at least some type of legal gambling, and that online gambling had been regulated in three states. Because of this, he says, it's time for Congress to enact brand new regulations to replace PASPA.

'Congress should adopt a framework that is federal allows states to authorize betting on professional sports, topic to strict regulatory requirements and technical safeguards,' he wrote.

Silver has previously made commentary suggesting he would be enthusiastic about seeing regulated sports betting in the usa, though this is the time that is first has presented his place in full. Other sports leagues declined to touch upon Silver's stance.

Cuban Backs Silver's Stance

However, a minumum of one NBA owner has already sided with the commissioner. Outspoken Dallas Mavericks owner Mark Cuban told CBSsports.com that 'Adam has it exactly right.'

'In the past for PR reasons, we have put up resistance that is token them,' Cuban stated. 'I trust Adam that now is the time to take sports betting out from the shadows and deal with it just like the huge business it is.'

Despite Silver's responses, however, New Jersey shouldn't expect the NBA to take out of a lawsuit that is aiming to stop the continuing state from allowing recreations betting to continue at its gambling enterprises and racetracks.

'Without a comprehensive federal solution, state measures such as New Jersey's recent effort will be both unlawful and bad public policy,' Silver penned.

Ron Paul Rails Against Adelson On-line Poker Ban Arrange

Ron Paul laid out his arguments against an online gambling ban that is highly supported by casino magnate Sheldon Adelson. (Image: David J. Phillip /AP)

Ron Paul has used their column that is weekly for Ron Paul Institute to argue against an Internet gambling ban, saying that such legislation would curtail the freedom of Us citizens and would be taken up limited to the advantage of casino owner Sheldon Adelson.

The previous Republican Representative from Texas called such legislation an example of 'cronyism,' one thing he says that many Americans are against no matter their political ideologies.

'For instance, Congress may soon vote on legislation outlawing Internet gambling,' Paul published.

'It is a secret that is open at least in the Beltway, that this legislation is being considered as an opt to billionaire casino owner, Sheldon Adelson. Mr. Adelson, who is perhaps best known for making use of their enormous wealth to advance a pro-war foreign policy, is now making use of his governmental impact to turn his online competitors into criminals.'

Gambling Ban Introduced to Congress in March

Paul's words relate to the Restoration of America's Wire Act (RAWA), a bill that had been introduced by Republicans both in homes of Congress in March, and it has since chosen up small but notable amounts of bipartisan support in both the House of Representatives and the Senate. The bill would outlaw most forms of on line gambling at the federal degree, really changing the wording of the Wire Act to explicitly ban casino games and poker rather than just recreations betting, since it is interpreted.

Paul spent much of his column dissecting and rejecting the various reasons given for supporting the ban in an effort to show that it was really only being considered with regard to Adelson.

'Supporters of an Internet gambling ban publicly deny they are inspired with a desire to curry favor with a rich donor,' Paul wrote. ' Instead, they give a true wide range of high-minded reasons for wanting to ban this activity. Some declare that legalizing online gambling will even enrich criminals and terrorists! But criminalizing online casinos will not get rid of the need for online casinos. Alternatively, passage of this legislation will likely guarantee that the online gambling market is controlled by crooks.'

Paul Criticizes States' Rights Argument

One of the major (and to many, perplexing) arguments employed by supporters of RAWA is such a ban would actually protect states' rights. Paul explained their argument before laying away his reasoning for why it was faulty.

'Their argument is the fact that citizens of states that ban Internet gambling may easily get those laws around by accessing online casinos operating in states where online gambling is legalized,' Paul stated. ' No matter if the argument had merit that enabling states to legalize online gambling undermines laws in other states, it wouldn't normally justify legislation that is federal the issue…arguing that 'states liberties' justifies creating new federal crimes turns the Tenth Amendment, which was intended to limit federal power, on its head.'

Paul organized several more arguments against the legislation before summarizing his opposition to a gambling ban that is online.

'The proposed ban on Internet gambling is an infringement that is blatantly unconstitutional our liberties which will probably expand the surveillance state,' he concluded. 'Worst of all, it is all being done for the benefit of one powerful billionaire.'

RAWA is unlikely to receive a hearing or see much movement in Congress during the current duck session that is lame. However, its prospects could improve in the next Congress, whenever Republicans will have majorities in both the home and Senate.