European Commission Calls for Online Gambling Health Warnings

European Commission Calls for Online Gambling Health Warnings

The European Commission has recommended health warnings become a component of online gambling advertisements. (Image:

Today, everybody is familiar with the ubiquitous warnings found on packages of cigarettes. They're just a little different from nation to nation, but they remind consumers associated with the well-known health problems that can occur because of smoking every time they look at a pack.

Now, the European Commission wants to see those warnings expanded to a new area: on line gambling. The commission will ask countries to in turn request that Internet video gaming advertisements include warning messages that explain the risks of gambling to watchers.

Recommendations Not Binding

The recommendation, reportedly part of a draft document that has been seen by Reuters, comes as europe is anticipated to suggest tighter controls on the gambling that is online this week. None of these tips could be legitimately binding, nevertheless they could be taken to heart by some nations, especially those that were already considering tighter rules within the sector.

The recommendations suggest warnings about a few areas of gambling. As an example, ads might point out chances of losing or winning, contain home elevators how to get help for issue gambling, or explore the possibility of becoming addicted. The EU also recommends a ban on Web gambling companies acting as sponsors for events that are targeted at minors.

According to the Commission that is european were 6.8 million online gamblers in the EU as of 2011. The industry is considered growing by 15 percent per year there, making it the fastest service that is growing in Europe. The industry is said to be well worth $14.3 billion in total.

The EU isn't the only real one thinking about putting limitations and regulations on online gambling adverts. Italy considered banning such adverts on television in radio, and ultimately passed a law which will place restriction on such ads within the future.

Gambling Advertisements Face Scrutiny

The recommendations come at a time when gambling firms have now been under scrutiny for both land-based and online tasks. Along with the World Cup being certainly one of the revenue streams that are biggest for bookmakers across the world, firms have been especially criticized for a few of the ads they have produced to promote gambling on the competition.

For instance, Irish wagering firm Paddy Power received fire last month after they changed 20 of these storefront signs to read Pelepower in an attempt to capitalize on the name of Pele, Brazil's legendary soccer hero. Pele's lawyers quickly sent an order that is cease-and-desist and Paddy Power took down the signs. In addition they drew fire for using an image that is fake of stripped Amazon rainforest with the message 'c'mon England PP' carved into the ground, and only unveiled the photo ended up being photoshopped after times of controversy.

Other companies were in trouble for misusing the Christ the Redeemer statue in advertisements. In Australia, flew a balloon that is giant of the statue over Melbourne, complete with an Australian jersey and their logo. The Redeemer with bikini-wearing models and keeping a bottle of alcohol along with the message 'There's a more exciting side to Brazil. in the UK, evangelicals were upset after City AM published a gambling ad that showed Christ'

Bookmakers into the UK such as William Hill have also faced criticism with regards to their methods, particularly over their usage of fixed-odds betting terminals. Critics say the devices prey on gambling addicts, and present appropriate changes have resulted in increased taxes on the games.

James Packer Earns License for Sydney Casino

James Packer's Sydney casino is scheduled to open in late 2019. (Image:

There actually was not any drama left in the procedure, but Australian casino magnate James Packer is be breathing a sigh of relief. That's because the NSW government has finally made the decision that is official allow a VIP casino to be built and operated in Sydney, a move they hope will lure big-time gamblers away from Macau also to Australia's shores.

The brand New South Wales (NSW) government has authorized a license for Packer's casino, as regulators have signed off on the proposed high rollers casino in Barangaroo. Packer's business, Crown Resorts, was handed five business days to pay the A$100 million ($94 million) licensing cost to the state.

Packer Passes Probity Check

The choice came down after what is actually a probity check into Packer and Crown. The investigation was conducted by the NSW Independent Liquor and Gaming Authority, and determined that Packer and his associates were of 'good repute having regard to character, sincerity and integrity.'

The move makes official exactly what has long been expected: the monopoly on casino gambling in Sydney which has always been held by Echo Entertainment will be coming to an end. However, The Star will nevertheless have another five years as the only game in city, as the new Crown establishment defintely won't be opening until November 2019.

License Restricts Gaming Strategies

The Barangaroo construction site is already active, as Crown is expecting to build a A$2 billion ($1.88 billion) complex that will include residential properties, a six-star hotel, and the casino itself. The casino will be limited by its 'restricted gaming license,' which does not enable slot machines, but will permit as many table games as the place desires to spread. According to Packer, the casino could have minimums that are high makes it a specialty casino that doesn't directly contend with The celebrity.

The regulatory investigation looked into Crown's monetary viability, as well as the background of its key employees to ensure that it 'remains free from criminal influence, exploitation and undesirable or unsatisfactory economic sources.' The research looked at both activity that is domestic Crown's investments overseas, but found absolutely nothing to avoid the Packer project from going forward.

One prospective issue didn't appear to make a visible impact in the regulators. In-may, Packer engaged in a public street fight with long-time friend David Gyngell in the Sydney suburb of Bondi. The brawl between Packer and Gyngell, the head of the Nine Network television place, came after Packer demanded Gyngell remove a news truck from outside Packer's home there. Some thought the spectacle that is public harm Crown's odds of being licensed by the NSW government, nonetheless it apparently wasn't a factor.

The NSW federal government will collect a minimum of $1 billion from licensing costs and gaming taxes over initial 15 years associated with the casino that is new operation. Most gambling revenue from the casino will be taxed at 29 percent, while revenues from international VIPs will be taxed just 10 percent.

Crown Resorts currently owns and operates two casinos in Australia: one in Melbourne, and another in Perth. The company also owns passions in casinos in Macau, the UK, Sri Lank and the United States.

Texas Lottery Demise Could Be Bingo Beginning

Texas Legislature establishes a committee to consider the repercussions of abolishing the lottery, but is bingo the solution? (Image:

Could it surely, finally, be curtains for the Texas Lottery? Its abolition happens to be debated for several years in the Texas Legislature, ever since 1991, in fact, whenever voters opted to amend the Constitution in order to permit lottery sales for the time that is first. In a collective rush of blood to the head, lawmakers even voted to scrap it in 2013, by 81-65, and then, realizing that they might have made a $2.2 billion mistake, hastily reassembled to agree to a new ballot to reinstate it. It had been authorized, 92-53.

And yet, the debate rages on. This week Texas House Speaker Joe Straus established a committee that is legislative of state senators and reps which will study the potential ramifications and repercussions of life without the lottery.

At the heart associated with the matter is the fact that, whilst it brings in $2.2 billion every 2 yrs which is spent on public education, its presence have not always meshed with Texas sensibilities that are religious. Many Christian organizations are against it, most notably those for the Baptist Christian lifestyle Commission, which has long campaigned for the removal. Both Republicans and Democrats have opposed it, meanwhile, and organizations that are non-religious such as for example the NAACP, have reported that it preys on the poor and minority groups.

$2.2 Billion Budget Hole

The committee goals are to examine means of plugging the hole that is rather sizeable in the state's training budget, if the lottery be axed, with 'charitable bingo' being high up on the list. This has until December 1 to report its findings.

'The home had a healthier and discussion that is productive the Texas Lottery a year ago, and this committee will stay that conversation,' stated Straus. 'I hope these Members will simply take an objective and thorough appearance at just how the lottery and charitable bingo impact our state.'

Charitable bingo is already permitted within the state. Community and organizations that are non-profit in a position to organize bingo games and sell pull-tabs under permit through the Texas Lottery Commission. But, sessions are restricted to three per week per organization, and also the prize that is maximum any game is capped at $750.

Lone Star Bingo

The character regarding the commission's research of bingo intrigues. Does it envisage some type of state bingo network that will link up to award a larger state-wide jackpot on top of localized games? Will bingo become state monopoly, and in that case will church businesses be forced to find more creative ways of fundraising? Would a bingo that is state-controlled be able to swerve the 'tax regarding the poor' accusation which incenses may Texans? And simply just how can you connect a $2.2 billion fiscal deficit with bingo anyway?

Lubbock State Representative John Frullo has the answer that is practical. While he supports the abolition of the lottery, he feels that extra resources can be found elsewhere in the budget, but it make take some number-crunching.

'Right now [while] the state's revenues are up that may be a time that is good eliminate not merely the lottery, but take a hard appearance the margins tax, and what exactly is happening there,' he said. ' We have to go through that budgeting procedure and look at that, and of course get gone the waste in the budget.'